No one knows precisely when humans first started a sustained, systematic practice of agriculture, but evidence has shown signs of agriculture in the Middle East and Mexico that date back to approximately 7000 BC. Some of the earliest cultivated crops included emmer wheat, wild barley, pumpkin, peas, and beans. The presence of larger scale, systematic cultivation often preceded or accompanied the rise of villages and cities and the formation of organized civilization.
The basic working unit of agriculture is the farm. Farmers plant seeds, cultivate soil and crops, harvest crops, and send them to market; or they breed animals for their milk, meat, hides, or other products. The basic farm cycle consists of planting, cultivation, harvesting, transport, processing, and marketing.
Farmers rely heavily on inputs, natural or man-made resources that allow them to grow, cultivate and harvest crops, or to breed animals. Inputs can be very costly and a farmer must usually go into debt to acquire them, on the hope that the farm's earnings will be sufficient to repay the debt, and, hopefully, provide a profit. To succeed, a farmer must learn techniques to use and manage these resources, such as land, soil, seed, and water, in the best way possible. Inputs include:
Choosing which crops to grow depends on many different factors, such as climate, prospects for selling the harvest, and type of soil. Some crops are grown for food for humans, some are grown to be feed for animals, some (such as cotton) are grown for industrial uses, and still others are grown to enrich the soil. Among the world's most common crops are:
Farmers must learn to negotiate many uncertainties that can have potentially disastrous effects on their crops.
Most of the research in farming and agriculture has been aimed at helping farmers overcome these uncertainties and maximize resources and production.
Scientific farming methods try to improve on nature by boosting the short-term abilities of plants to fight disease, absorb nutrients from soil and fertilizers, and provide better yields. Scientific farming has became widespread in the latter half of the 20th century and has been instrumental in the change from family farms to larger, "corporate" farms.
With great increases in population in this century, especially in the Third World, there has been growing concern that traditional agricultural methods would be unable to keep up with increased demand for food.
In the 1940's, a handful of scientists, sponsored by the Rockefeller Foundation, were invited to Mexico to look into ways to modernize and improve the efficiency of Mexican farmers. The group, led by agronomist Norman Borlaug, investigated a combination of factors:
This research found rapid success. In many cases, farmers using Green Revolution hybrids were able to double their output in less than a decade.
In the 1960's, Green Revolution methods were transplanted to Asia, but the emphasis of hybrid research was on wheat and rice. The results were impressive:
OUTPUT (metric tons)
China South Asia
rice wheat maize rice wheat maize
1961-1965 72.2 19.1 20 72.7 15.5 6
1986-1990 176.9 90.1 80 135.9 63.5 10
Critics claim that these methods foster dependence on expensive inputs, diminish the natural genetic diversity and resilience of "natural" seed, and promote the intensive use of fertilizers, herbicides, and insecticides, which can lead to pollution of soil and groundwater. There is some evidence that only the wealthiest farmers with large farms and the resources to acquire expensive inputs were able to benefit from Green Revolution methods.
There are, of course, many types of farms and farming techniques, but the latter half of the 20th century has seen a kind of polarization of 2 distinct types of farming: scientific farming and sustainable agriculture. Both methods attempt to increase yields and use resources as efficiently as possible, but how they try to achieve these goals is very different. While scientific farming relies on technology to try to improve on nature, sustainable agriculture tries to nurture and foster nature's own processes.
Generally, sustainable agriculture favors (and often requires) the use of organic natural substances, including organic seed (seed not treated with pesticides or other chemicals), organic soil amendments, such as compost or bat guano (bat feces), and organic pesticides, such as neem.
While sustainable agriculture has been proven to provide safe, reliable crops in a way that has a minimum negative impact on land and people, gains in productivity have not kept up with the gains made with scientific methods. Critics of sustainable agriculture argue that without the intervention of science, outputs will not be able to keep up with anticipated increases in demand, and that crops grown with sustainable methods are simply too expensive to benefit the general public.
Many food crops are consumed with a minimum of processing, but the trend in developed countries is toward more processing. For example, instead of buying lettuce, tomatoes, carrots, and various greens at a local farmers market, consumers can now buy a pre-packaged salad (with added chemical preservatives) in a local hypermarket chain store. Processing food products "adds value" to the product, which essentially means that companies can charge more to consumers. The use of processed foods was pioneered in the United States, and is increasing in other parts of the world.
Throughout history, farming has been a family enterprise, with most farmers taking care of their own needs, and maybe producing a little extra to sell or trade. In the latter half of the 20th century, the trend in the more developed nations (and increasingly in the less-developed nations) is toward corporate farms. The Green Revolution made impressive gains in crop yields, but the new methods and technologies often bypassed smaller farmers, who did not have the resources to acquire the costly inputs needed to grow Green Revolution hybrids.
Vertical integration: We have seen that agriculture has several phases to a growing and consuming cycle: planting, cultivating, harvesting, storage, transport, processing, and marketing. Traditional farming practices have emphasized the farmer's participation in the phases actually connected with the growing and harvesting of crops. Often, local specialists would be involved in other phases, such as transport or marketing.
A modern trend, however, has been toward vertical integration: one company being responsible for all, or most, phases in the cycle. Large agribusiness companies are manufacturing inputs (such as seed, fertilizer, and pesticides); acquiring farms; managing the transport, processing, and marketing of their products; and researching new ways to improve their products through processes such as genetic engineering.
Accompanying the rise of scientific farming and the widespread increase of yields of many crops and animals, prices for agricultural goods have remained fairly flat from the 1970's well into the 1990's. This has been a positive development for consumers, but the effect on farmers, especially small farmers, has been disastrous.
This is one of the many economic uncertainties of farming as a business. There is a fine balancing act with prices, demand, and production, and world and local economic conditions. Increased production means increased supply and low prices for the farmer, while decreased production means higher prices for both farmer and consumer. Here are some common scenarios:
It is in the best interests of all governments to formulate policies that are beneficial to farmers. A stable, reasonably-priced food supply and productive, well-paid farmers are two very important components of a stable society. However, the combination of cheap food for consumers and high market prices for farmers is very difficult to achieve. Some common policy tools include:
The science of genetics has made astonishing progress in the last half of the 20th century. Geneticists have made remarkable gains in deciphering the genetic code that gives each species its particular traits. They have discovered methods of transplanting genetic material from one species to another, and have been able to transfer such genetic traits as disease resistance, time to maturity, or the yield that a plant produces.
Unlike hybrids, genetically manipulated (GM) plants are not sterile, but some agribusiness firms have produced so-called "terminator" genes, which prevent a GM plant from germinating and reproducing. Another development is a plant that is resistant to a particular variety of herbicide. Both of these developments have been very controversial, provoking charges that they have been developed, not with the best interests of farmers in mind, but with the goal of selling more seeds and herbicides.
While early success has been considerable, there is widespread concern that we just don't know enough about the long-term consequences of genetic manipulation of crops and animals. For example, if the terminator genes from a GM wheat species were somehow to cross-pollinate with any number of wild plants around them, it could well mean the end of those wild varieties. Likewise, if the herbicide-resistance gene were to pollinate with a species of weed, the result might be to create a species of nearly indestructible superweed.
If agriculture is to meet the demands and uncertainties of the future, here are some main areas that will need to be addressed:
What is needed is a comprehensive view, which keeps in mind technology, environment and ecosystems, social questions, and the difficult task of feeding an ever-increasing population with affordable food, in a way that is fair to all types of farmers and consumers.